Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: MK II or MKIII MR2


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 234
Date:
MK II or MKIII MR2


It'll be a while before I can make this purchase, but I wanted to know what you guys think about which MR2 I should get. I think I want a spyder, the 3rd gen, but the turbo wouldn't be bad either. Its got a lot more power and is faster in a line than the 3rd gen but weighs 600 lbs more, is older/less reliable. I will most likely be autoxing at first and hopefully track days soon after. I was thinking about turbo-ing the 3rd gen, that would make it pretty sweet. I heard you can get from 140 hp to 200 with less than 5psi, which would be cool. Just lmk what you think about either car. thanks.
-Eric

__________________
Racing is stupid, until you get a car.


VP

Status: Offline
Posts: 2304
Date:

MK II no question

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 234
Date:

do you think it would be faster at an autox and almost as reliable as the spyder? It would be my daily too and I don't want it blowing up at a race...

__________________
Racing is stupid, until you get a car.


VP

Status: Offline
Posts: 2304
Date:

I dont know how they would compare at an auto-x. The mkII definitely is capable of more power but as far as the chassis, they're both good. I'd say the spyder is would be more reliable just because its newer but the 3s-gte is pretty solid.

__________________
Ian


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:

Oh I can speak with experience on this one. Spyder's are the quickest at the AutoX hands down. BUT THEY SUCK. No trunk space, and they are ugly. The SW20 NA is a really good autocross slut, the turbos usually are slower. The nice thing about the SW's is how practical they really are. Lost of trunk space, the cabins are roommie, I'm 6'3" and I had a ton of space in mine, two trunks (front trunk is the best for groceries) and not to mention what a sexy bitch that car is.

If I was to do it all over again, it would be a stripper SW20, no T-Tops unless you like water dripping on your left leg while its raining, with a V6 swap. With that age of car, you will have to go thru the suspension anyways and why not upgrade the brakes while you are at it (91+ turbo brakes) Done and Done.

The big downfall to a Mid engine car in Florida is how it acts when it is raining. The front end being light with the ass-end that acts as a big pendulum when things go bad is something to think about in a state that has a monsoon season.

All in all, if I could afford it, I would have me another SW20 at the drop of a hat.

Edit:  Oh it has been such a long time since I posted last that my Sig made me laugh.

-- Edited by Ian on Monday 3rd of August 2009 08:36:38 PM

__________________


Civic

Status: Offline
Posts: 615
Date:

Ian wrote:

Edit:  Oh it has been such a long time since I posted last that my Sig made me laugh.

-- Edited by Ian on Monday 3rd of August 2009 08:36:38 PM




its awesome lol



__________________

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard